API PUBL 4733:2004 pdf download.Risk-Based Screening Levels for the Protection of Livestock Exposed to Petroleum Hydrocarbons
3. Conceptual Site Model
A conceptual site model (CSM) identifies complete and potentially complete exposure pathways and receptors to be considered in a risk assessment. If no complete significant pathway(s) exist for exposure of livestock to petroleum hydrocarbons, a screening-level risk evaluation for livestock is not necessary. By definition, if there is little to no significant exposure to a potentially toxic compound, there is little to no likelihood of significant unacceptable risk to the receptor from that compound. A CSM was developed as presented in Figure 1 to assess the potential for exposures to livestock and the need for a risk evaluation. Components of a CSM generally include receptor evaluation and exposure pathway evaluation, which are described below.
3.1 Receptor Evaluation
Livestock that are potentially vulnerable to toxic effects of petroleum hydrocarbons include animals that could ingest significant quantities of soil, water, and/or food in oil-contaminated areas. Access to the contaminated areas is key; cattle, sheep, goats, and horses that forage in pasture areas are more likely to be potential receptors, while species that are raised in more confined and controlled conditions, such as chickens or pigs, would have less chance of exposure to petroleum hydrocarbons. Outside of the United States, other types of livestock animals may also be exposed to petroleum compounds, such as camels, llamas, oxen, etc. It was assumed that exposures to these receptors would be similar to those of typical livestock in the United States based on similarities in body weights and feeding habits.
3.2 Pathway Evaluation
The pathways by which livestock could be exposed to petroleum hydrocarbons are incidental soil ingestion, water ingestion, and direct ingestion, inhalation, dermal absorption, and plant ingestion. Based on available information, the primary exposure pathways considered significant in the exposure model as show in the CSM (Figure 1) included incidental soil ingestion, water ingestion, and direct petroleum product ingestion. Inhalation, dermal absorption, and plant ingestion were considered minor pathways for petroleum hydrocarbons (CCME 2000). The exposure pathways listed above are described in more detail below.
3.2.1 Soil Ingestion
Soil can comprise a substantial proportion of the livestock diet. Livestock may consume soil inadvertently during grazing (Zach and Mayoh 1984; CCME 2000) or may intentionally ingest salty-tasting soil (Coppock et al. 1995). According to the CCME (2000), cattle are exposed to petroleum hydrocarbons primarily through consumption of contaminated soils, particularly during grazing. The authors state that the majority of petroleum hydrocarbon exposure in cattle is due to ingestion of surface soils.
API PUBL 4733:2004 pdf download
PS:Thank you for your support!
